How does bcs selection work

As they'd be ahead of the Big East champion, they'd get an automatic bid. The reason is because:. The Fiesta Bowl gets first pick and will select Oregon. It hasn't been announced yet, of course, but there's no way it doesn't take Oregon.

The Sugar Bowl goes next. If they don't, then it's likely to be Clemson. That team will be the winner of the Louisville-Rutgers game this coming weekend. For the SEC team in the Sugar to get anyone else would require some crazy scenarios going down. Back to the calculations. As you may have surmised, by virtue of taking the number of points for each team in each component, and dividing by a certain number, there will be fractional numbers for each component.

You may have a team that has a score of 0. You simply average these to come up with the final BCS point total. In this example, the BCS score would be 0. You can count me among those who favor a playoff. The Sooners have generally been shown a whole lot of favor in the BCS rankings, and that looks to be the case again this year provided they keep winning.

Why am I so against the BCS? I'm actually against the heavily entrenched system of "ranking" teams in sports. I think that it really makes no difference what rankings say, and I think that it is a horrible method of determining postseason play. It's fine for power rankings, but that's about where I think it should end. The reason I do a BCS post every week on Crimson and Cream Machine is to show our readers where the Sooners rank, because the BCS is the method used to determine postseason play, and I think that everyone should be informed.

The ranking system is flawed because you are assuming that you can place teams in some sort of hierarchy in which one team is better than the other. However, this is not true. Sports are about winning, championships, and what you do on the field.

Professional football, basketball, baseball, and hockey all employ playoffs at the end of the year, and teams that are guaranteed spots won their division. Because that's the way that it should be. You could argue to me that Alabama is a better football team than Western Kentucky, and I wouldn't argue with you. Is that true? How can you definitively say that when both teams are undefeated?

The idea that the regular season is a playoff is somewhat true and somewhat of a farce. I think that it's true in the sense that you need to emerge from this playoff relatively unscathed to win your conference. If you think invoking the option sounds unlikely, consider that last season the Big East and ACC had only one team each in the top 14, and the Big Ten barely had two, with Illinois at No. The possibility of not having enough eligible at-large teams actually prompted the BCS to add that provision during the season.

That is plausible for this season, and it would cause the BCS to have to invoke that rule. After the top two teams and the tie-ins are sorted out, whichever bowls lose their tie-in teams to the BCSCG get to choose first.

The bowl that lost No. In the case of the past two seasons, that was the Rose Bowl since it lost Big Ten champ Ohio State to the national title game each year.

There is a catch though: The bowl that lost No. The procedure in selecting which teams is where it gets a little confusing. There are two different types of teams AQ-teams automatic qualifying and non-AQ. Ten teams are chosen to participate in one of five bowl games. Bowl organizers are contractually obligated to host the champion of one of the five designated conferences. Why these specific conferences?

What about the others? Well, all conferences had an opportunity to earn automatic qualifications during a four-year evaluation during the seasons. The above mentioned were the five that met the criteria.

The champion team from each AQ-conference will automatically earn a trip to one of the five BCS bowl games -- at least until , when their contract ends. The AQ conferences have contracts with bowl organizers and T.