When was copenhagen climate conference




















It also should go as far as possible in defining implementation and accounting rules. Support for Developing Countries. The agreement should broadly establish the mechanisms, sources, and levels of support to be provided in a final agreement for adaptation, capacity building, forestry and technology deployment in developing countries. A Sound System of Verification. The review process should culminate in a clear determination of whether or not a country is complying with its commitments, with facilitative remedies in cases of non-compliance.

Developed countries' promises to fund actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to the inevitable effects of climate change in developing countries. Agreement on the measurement, reporting and verification of developing country actions, including a reference to "international consultation and analysis", which had yet to be defined.

Next conference. UN Climate Change Conference. Thus, while some parties will likely look to those negotiating processes to elaborate and fully operationalize the accord, no formal link was established.

A set of decisions addressing the core elements of the Bali Action Plan, and a core decision tying them together, were not completed. While parties made modest progress in some areas, many of the draft texts remain heavily bracketed.

A number of countries including the United States argued for is reinsertion, but were opposed by others including India and Saudi Arabia. The Kyoto parties adopted a decision forwarding the incomplete texts and calling on the AWG-KP to complete its work for adoption next year at the meeting of the Kyoto parties to be held in parallel with COP The UN Conference on Climate Change in Copenhagen presents a critical opportunity to strengthen the international response to global climate change.

The aim in Copenhagen should be a comprehensive political agreement that puts countries on a clear path to concluding …. View Details Download pdf, KB. This …. A new global climate agreement will be most effective if parties are confident that it enables them to assess how well others are fulfilling their obligations.

This can be achieved through a rigorous system of measurement, reporting, and verification. Key …. Policy Hub » International. On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. Hill continued: "It proposes a green fund to be run by a board but the big risk is that it will run by the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility [a partnership of 10 agencies including the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme] and not the UN.

That would be a step backwards, and it tries to put constraints on developing countries when none were negotiated in earlier UN climate talks. The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week.

It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week. Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders.

Footnote: This article was amended on 9th December



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000